Tupelo to forego immediate bus service
by Emily Le Coz/NEMS Daily Journal
9 months ago | 505 views | 12 12 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
TUPELO – The city has decided to scrap a plan to run public buses by Christmas and will instead study its long-term transportation needs.

The City Council deleted from its agenda this week a potential contract with Northeast Mississippi Community Services to run two buses in Tupelo. It would have cost $68,000 a year and provided rides to the public for $1 fares.

It could have been operational by Christmas.

But Council President Fred Pitts said the city would rather pursue the $25,000 transit study pitched earlier this year by the citizen-based Tupelo Public Transportation Committee.

The five-member committee had recommended the study to determine the community’s need for public bus service and define the kind of system necessary to support it. It also would estimate its cost.

Council members had approved $12,500 to fund the study, with another $12,500 coming from an Appalachian Regional Commission grant.

But the committee also recommended a short-term contract with NMCS to provide immediate bus service while awaiting the study results, which could take a year to receive.

Committee member David Puckett said Wednesday he was disappointed to learn of the council’s decision. He said people need public transit, and they need it now.

“If we leave it up to them and don’t get the public involved,” Puckett said, “they’ll sit on their blooming hands and do nothing like they did last time and the time before that.”

Tupelo has been without public transportation since Lift Inc. stopped its limited bus service several years ago. In the meantime, those who cannot drive must rely on taxis or friends and families for rides.

Puckett, who is blind, says he spends $10 daily on cab fare to get to work.

It’s unclear when the committee will select a consulting firm to handle the transportation study. Members have been in contact with different firms during the past months and could select one shortly.

Contact Emily Le Coz at (662) 678-1588 or emily.lecoz@djournal.com.

comments (12)
« Mr.T wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 06:30 PM »
As crowded as some of the roadways get now, I would think that getting some of the cars off them would be a good idea. I think that many of our senior citizens would rather ride a bus than have to drive in congested areas.

I have never heard that public transportation is considered the downfall of a city. And as far as pollution is concerned, Memphis is currently using several electric powered buses.
report abuse
« americasgone wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 04:27 PM »
If you guys think it will stop with a "few" buses you are very naive. Those buses are going to be diesel and not near as pollution friendly as the gasers most of you drive. There will be plenty of soot coming out of the tailpipe of those things. And we will see how happy you are to have public transportation when you get caught in traffic behind one of them. And ultracreep poor people = crime. Lets give them access to the whole city why don't we. No thanks, I would rather keep them where they are. Bad enough we have to feed and cloth them now we are going drive them around town at our expense too? Why don't we quit giving poor people freebies and ask them to take care of themselves.

Now as far as people like Mr. Puckett go I am all for public transit for the handicapped and elderly. But how long do you think it will be before the buses are full of (you fill in the blank)? Won't it be nice when you can catch a ride to the mall for a buck and rob some lady in the parking lot, then catch a bus back home.
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 01:40 PM »
I would and could walk from my house to Main St. and it wouldn't hurt most of the populace of the most obese state in America to get off their arses and walk, even if it's only to a bus stop.
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 01:38 PM »
So basically, americasgone, what you're saying is you don't want to have to actually see the poor folks come out of the wood work to ride a bus. God, for people that live in the poorest state in the union, a lot of you are pretty frigging snobby.
report abuse
« tupelojoe81 wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 01:38 PM »
so you would walk from your house to Gloster or Main St? Assuming you dont live on either of those.....
report abuse
« pilotricardo wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 01:25 PM »
I think public transportation is a great idea. Can't really see how a few extra buses running will cause the fumes and noise that americasgone is talking about. Especially when people like me would be willing to leave the car at home to commute.

By the way, who are these "undesirables" and where will they be that they already aren't?
report abuse
« tupelojoe81 wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 10:43 AM »
well said!
report abuse
« americasgone wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 10:36 AM »
Public transportation is always the first sign of a cities demise. When you start smelling the fumes and hearing the noise of these buses you will know what I mean. Not to mention that "undesirables" will start showing up in places around town you never saw them before.
report abuse
« tupelojoe81 wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 09:11 AM »
but the busses were only going to run on Gloster and Main Street......doesnt exactly pick up the people in need.....
report abuse
« scar-strangled-banter wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 08:54 AM »
I would totally ride the bus to work. I could probably drive there cheaper but a bus would save our lives sometimes.

I guess we don't need busses but the otion would be nice.
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 08:37 AM »
We do need buses. There are, believe it or not, a large contingent of people who have no cars, or families with only one car. A bus system would enable people of limited means to have consistent access to a way to work, to the doctor, or to college that they otherwise wouldn't have had. Not to mention the fact that it's good for the environment.
report abuse
« tupelojoe81 wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 07:14 AM »
waste of time.....we dont need busses....
report abuse