Biz Buzz



MDA awards energy grants to local groups
by carlie.kollath
 Biz Buzz
3 hrs 1 min ago | 67 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

We previously told you about two of these winners (American and Lane). Here are the rest.

Excerpts of a press release from the Mississippi Development Authority:

Jackson, Miss. (September 2, 2010) – The Mississippi Development Authority (MDA) recently awarded 13 additional grants, totaling $2.16 million, as part of the second – and final – round of the Mississippi Job Protection through Energy Economic Development Program.

The job protection program is part of the State Energy Program (SEP) funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). The Job Protection Program has allocated a total of $7.81 million to eligible companies in the second round. “Funding through the Mississippi Job Protection through Energy Economic Development Program helps businesses around the state become more energy-efficient and enables them to lower their utility costs,” said Karen Bishop, MDA Stimulus Division director. “Lowering operating costs open up capital for job creation and retention, which are the primary purposes of the program.”

The local winners in this round:

  • American Furniture Manufacturing, Inc., Ecru: $100,000 for lighting retrofits
  • Bauhaus USA, Inc., Saltillo: $30,000 for lighting retrofits
  • Flexsteel Industries, Inc., Starkville: $200,000 for lighting retrofits
  • FMC Technologies, Saltillo: $125,000 for lighting retrofits
  • Harrisburg Cultural and Social Services Center, Inc., Tupelo: $150,000 for lighting retrofits/HVAC system upgrades
  • Lane Furniture Industries, Inc., Saltillo: $550,000 for lighting retrofits/HVAC system upgrades
  • MartinRea Fabco Automated Structures (USA), Inc., Shannon: $38,000.00 for lighting retrofits
  • Northeast Mississippi Business Incubation System, Corinth: $50,000 for lighting retrofits
  • Synergetics Diversified Computer Services, Inc., Starkville: $230,000 for lighting retrofits/HVAC system upgrades

comments (0)
no comments yet
Fairpark agency talks about future of district
by carlie.kollath
 Biz Buzz
4 hrs 38 mins ago | 269 views | 6 6 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
image from FairparkDistrict.com
image from FairparkDistrict.com
slideshow

We’re live at the monthly meeting of the Tupelo Redevelopment Agency. The agency is the city-created board charged with overseeing the development of the Fairpark District in downtown Tupelo.

The meeting started at 2 and is slated to end at 5 p.m. It’s at the Downtown Tupelo Main Street office and Daphene with Main Street has been kind enough to provide us with coffee.

Attendees:

  • John Oxford, chairman
  • Lynn Norris, city CFO
  • Debbie Brangenberg, city liaison and exec director of Main Street
  • Reed Hillen, board member
  • Darrell Smith, city COO
  • BJ Teal, director of the city’s development services department
  • Brad Prewitt, board member
  • Tony Bologna, design and development consultant from Memphis
  • Jim Collins, board member
  • Daphene Hendricks, an employee of Main Street and TRA

The board approved its monthly bills:

  • $4,624.88 to Ten Oaks Consulting for Fairpark maintenance
  • $377.48 to Sundance Water Design

The board opens its annual worksession. Topics on the agenda:

  • vision
  • land use planning
  • identify projects for development
  • marketing

Tony Bologna, consultant who has worked with Fairpark since the beginning to help shape its design:

When Toyota first started, there was a lot of talk and excitement about Fairpark. Then Toyota put it on hold, but now that it is back on, the talk is back. We need to talk about the future of Fairpark.

We need to have something always going on. One way to do that would be with residential. We could pick one lot and build a house on it to our guidelines and how we want it. People want to see things going on. It’s not good when something hasn’t happened in six months.

One way to do it – TRA already owns the lot. You have to find a builder you trust and then fund the building and pay the builder a fee.

You build just one at a time. You don’t build a bunch at a time. Once you get a contract for sale on the house, you roll the money into the construction of another house.

You don’t tie up a bunch of money in this, maybe $200,000. Square footage could be 1,600 to 2,300.

We did this in Harbor Town (the Memphis mixed-use development Fairpark is modeled after). It allowed us to include the details and the quality that we wanted.

Another way – builder could submit all the bills each month and then TRA pays all the bills. That’s kind of a bookkeeping nightmare.

House was sold in Harbor Town through Realtors who made full commission on the sale.

Another way to stir up interest – keep the area manicured. Grass needs to be mowed. Everything needs to be manicured.

Reed Hillen, board member: We haven’t decided about where we will go with Tommy Morgan’s proposal (previous coverage), but if we did, we could tie in something with a home sale.

Bologna: The key thing is getting the right house. The “wow” factor has to be there.

Hillen: We need more small, upscale houses. We don’t have that in Tupelo. If and when we decide to go back to Tommy, we need to make a home sale part of that.

Debbie Brangenberg, city liaison and exec director of Downtown Tupelo Main Street Association: What incentives did you offer to get people to move to the island?

Bologna: We had different issues that you do. People didn’t want to move out to the island because they had to go through bad neighborhoods.

Here, people are downtown so they don’t have that issue. I think you have people who don’t want to be the lone ranger. They don’t want to move downtown and have vacant lots and weeds next to them. If offices move down here, they want to have shops and restaurants by them.

Next part of this is how do we get some real mixed-used things in the buildings around City Hall.

Plus, we’ve got the apartments – the biggest thorn in our side. We’ve got to come up with incentives to make apartments work. Henry Turley said he’s still willing to do it if we can figure out how to make it work.

Study said the highest rent people would pay is 85 cents/square foot. But we would need a little over $1 to make it work. That’s too high of a gap.

Hillen: Why are we talking about apartments again? Is this the apartment complex by the pond? I thought we decided we didn’t want to do that. Why do we have to?

Bologna: Apartments at some point create that sense of critical mass. It gets people downtown.

Toyota changes the whole dynamics. If it gets blowing and going again in a year, it might change all the dynamics. We can take a look at that later.

And parking, there’s too much parking behind City Hall. We’re never going to fill that up again. We’ve talked about doing a building in part of the parking lot. Wouldn’t think about doing that now, but we should keep that in the back of our mind for later.

Should think about mixed-use building on the other side of the parking lot. Get someone who can use the whole first floor (maybe office tenant) and have floors of apartments up above. That makes sense.

I think you’ll have a lot more activity as Toyota gets closer.

Oxford: For better or for worse, Sunday alcohol sales has interested several restaurants that weren’t interested before.

Good lot for a coffee/donut shop is the grass patch in front of Hilton. We don’t own it but it’d be a good spot to market for that.

Bologna: What’s going on with the commercial/residential association?

Brangenberg: I think the residential owners are ready to go forward but the commercial owners aren’t sure. Stanford is the big unknown.

Bologna: What do we need to go forward? We already have the documents with the point structure. I think we need to get the association put in place as soon as possible. Can just start with residential association.

We’ve presented it two or three times to the owners. We’ve made adjustments.

Brangenberg: We should look back over and see if we need to make more adjustments since it’s been a while since we’ve looked at it.

Bologna: Brad and I are on the committee. We can review it and present it again in an open session. We can’t let this drag on any more.

Prewitt: We need to get all the people together and let them know that we’re doing this. We keep saying “we’re selling this” and “we’re doing that” but the people who live there are the ones who sell the neighborhood.

Bologna: Absolutely. The people who live there, if they don’t feel they have a vested interest in the neighborhood, they aren’t going to sell it.

Oxford: If we do this for a third time, it needs to be for finality. We can’t keep getting these people to come back. They aren’t going to do it if we do that. We can’t keeping asking them to get in a room for two hours and speak legal terms to them for two hours.

Prewitt: What if we got renderings on billboards of what we wanted to do? I bring people down there all the time and they have a hard time visualizing what we want to do.

Bologna: We can do billboards if we are going to do the development.

Members and Bologna are talking about the “awful brown nonfence” in the residential area that has just fence posts and steps to nowhere. They are asking what they can do about it because they don’t own the property. No decisions or recommendations made, but the discussion should warn the property owners – you and your lawn mowing habits are being watched :-)

Bologna: Points determine how much the lot owners pay in association/maintenance fees. Back before, we set the maintence budget at $100,000 and that was really high. (Prewitt said the budget also included commercial lots).

Brangenberg: People at the meeting couldn’t get past that number. It was a sample budget. It wasn’t a real budget. It wasn’t what it would really cost.

Bologna: You have a track record now and you know how much it costs to maintain. You should put together a real budget now and present it to them.

Prewitt: People wanted to know what would happen to any extra money.

Bologna: You could lower fees for the next year. Or you can put it in reserve. In Harbor Town, we put the money in reserve for road paving. Or you can invest the money in reserve. Once you figure out how much money you need in reserve, you can start lessening the fees.

Residential development gets development in a mixed-use development gets included in the commercial association not the residential because that gets too complicated. And the residential people would pay the building owner and not the association.

You get into the Us versus Them all the time. Commercial versus Residential. In order to get this put to bed, we just need to establish the residential association on their own. And maybe later, we can establish the commercial association on their own.

General talking: Stalking horse bidder has been identified for Stanford building in Fairpark. Full auction is supposed to be this month.

Bologna: What would really help is to get development on the former Oby’s and Joe/Chad Kea lot. It’s tough because people who could get a loan last year can’t.

Oxford (banker at Renasant): You know something is up when mortgage rates are so low and people still aren’t buying. Money is cheap and people still aren’t buying homes.

Prewitt: And as a contractor, I can tell you that they aren’t building because they don’t have jobs.

Brangenberg: TRA has about $850,000 to work with.

Oxford: I don’t ever want to see us get below $500,000.

Prewitt: A big mistake people make is when they hear Toyota is coming they think “Instant people. Instant goldmine.” That’s not going to happen. A lot of developers lost out in other areas because they thought that. We have the advantage of using their experience.

What you’ve got to remember about Toyota, in order to save face, the people who buy these homes, the homes can’t be more than the guy who runs the plant. And from what I understand, the guy has a home that is $350,000.

So whatever we do has to be less than that.

Bologna: If we did this, a good first home would be $175,000.

Prewitt: You’ve got to create a lot of bang for your buck. What we’ve got now – we’ve got a lot of really nice properties. But what we lack now is “I’ve got to have it right now.” We’ve got to do that.

Members are halfway joking that they need to make the homes more appealing to the women because the women are the ones that make the buying decision.

Collins: I still feel we to get that area to itself. It needs to feel like it is an area by itself.

Bologna: In the plans for a year or two down the road is to fence in that area.

Prewitt: I hate fences. My idea is that we plant trees all around our perimeter edge. Large trees. LARGE trees.

Collins: Absolutely.

Bologna: You need to develop in bite sizes. Don’t do 40 at a time. Do 5. Easier and you develop a sense of urgency because you say “There’s only 1 lot left before we go to the next phase.”

Prewitt: If this was my piece of property, I would plant trees along the perimeter and then I would strategically plant trees at specific areas inside the the development in groves. I’d also plant grass that stays green all year.

Collins: A lot of people have asked me about the cattle barn. We’ve got to block that off.

Prewitt: 20-25 foot trees could do that. My suggestion is that we plant several types of trees and that we don’t plant them in a row. We want them to look natural.

We want to block the view.

It’s hard to sell a house in the middle of what appears to be a street.

Bologna: Hard for people to visualize. When they see it now, they think, “That’s what I’m going to be looking at for now on.”

Prewitt: We need something growing and alive out there. When you go out there and it looks like tumbleweeds, it’s hard for a buyer to visualize it. That’s what we’re lacking.

My experience is that most people, including myself, do not have good imaginations when it comes to seeing the finished product. What about a rendering?

Bologna: That’s valid. I can see us putting a rendering out there.

Oxford: Last thing there is to talk about is the housing project.

Bologna: You can’t let the builder do it on his own dime or it won’t get done. It needs to be overseen locally.

Prewitt (of JBHM): This is my background and I’ll volunteer to oversee and I’ll throw in my part for nothing.

We can build the house – we can build the house ourselves. I’ll manage that. We can hire the subs and TRA will actually build it. This will get it rolling and I’ll do it for free. Y’all think about it.

I know I’ll do it right because I want to sell some stuff out there. And you’ve got to have the best subcontractors out there. We’ve got to have the job so the buyers when they walk up they say, “I can’t get this anywhere else and I want this.”

Collins: We’ve got to do this right.

Bologna: The goal is to show everyone what we think is right. We’ve got to do it right so they’ll see what we mean.

Members are talking and saying there is one lot left in the current phase. It’s sandwiched between two houses and it’s a tough lot. Members say that lot would make a good lot for TRA to build on.

Hillen: We need to come up with incentives to get commercial development in Fairpark. We need to get someone to step up and build. We could severely discount the lot prices.

Brangenberg: We could sit down and review the lot prices.

BJ Teal of the city: My primary concern is stabilization of neighborhoods and blighted areas.

First thing has to be the overall appearance of these areas so they will attract developers and increase our land values and help the tax bases.

In Fairpark, what if some of the incentives could be infrastructure in place? Sewer lines, underground utilities …

Oxford: What happened to the property we deeded over to the Neighborhood Development Corp (headed by Zell Long at the city) by the basketball courts by Front Street?

Teal: We have 12 lots. My goal over the next few months is to attract developers to build.

Public meeting wrapping up.

Members identify the following projects for the to-do list:

  • building a house in Fairpark
  • planting trees around the perimeter of the project
  • determining appropriate landscaping plants (grass varieties and trees)
  • creating the residential association
  • reviewing lot prices

Collins makes a motion to pursue a homebuilding project. Members all vote to study how TRA could build the home itself and make the project cost-effective.

Members vote to go into an executive session to discuss the pricing of the lot next to the Renasant Bank property and to discuss the time limitations in a contract to build.

An executive session means that the members and their invitees discuss business in a private meeting that is without the media and is off the record. This is a 100 percent legal session due to the nature of the reasons stated before the session started.

Regular session started back after 30 minutes.

Board has authorized John Oxford to negoitiate a land sale.

Another motion has been made and passed to sell the lots with the original bylaws, which require residential landowners to develop the property within one year. The board voted to amend the bylaws and contract to require landowners to come in 60 days after the year passes to give TRA an update on the property and allow for a property review.

Meeting adjourned after 2.5 hours.

comments (6)
« WTFDude wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 07:09 PM »
A lot of people, especially Mayor "Task Force" Reed need to take off the rose colored glasses and realize what Tupelo is and isn't and stop trying to make it something else.

Tupelo is a small southern town and, like WLJ said, there's nothing wrong with that.

But small southern towns, don't have, don't need, and can't afford:

1) A helicopter

2) An airport

3) A bus system

4) A communications director and other unnecessary "staff"

5) A deputy police chief that can't effectively lead because they've committed felonies while on the job and are now un-certifiable.

6) Annexation of more land when it can't service the citizens it has already.

7) Hiring consultants and forming "task forces" to make nearly every decision.

8) Bike lanes that only a few dozen people a year will ever use.

9) Trying to force the creation of entertainment districts.

10) Building of entertainment venues with taxpayer money

11) And probably a dozen other things that Jack Jr. thinks Tupelo needs but doesn't realize it can't afford

« WLJ wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 06:44 PM »
A Hard Rock in Tupelo? That's hilarious!

There's SO MUCH that would need to change about Tupelo before either a Hard Rock or an entertainment district in general is even a realistic topic of discussion.

And what needs to change has a lot more to do with the attitudes of Tupelo's citizens than it does with the local government trying to force the development of an entertainment district.

Tupelo is a small town, and there's nothing wrong with that. But stop trying to make it something that it is not now and will probably never be, no matter how hard you try or how much taxpayer money you spend.
« WTFDude wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 06:35 PM »
You really wonder why there's no Hard Rock Cafe in Tupelo?

Really? You're serious? Are you related to Jack Reed Jr.?

I'll bet you think that Tupelo is ready to try to develop an "entertainment district" too, huh?

Name another non-oceanfront US town of 40,000 people that has a Hard Rock Cafe?

Elvis' birthplace is not enough of a draw to support a Hard Rock Cafe.

So, the reason that there's not a Hard Rock in Tupelo is simple, Tupelo doesn't fit the demographic model that they use when determining where to put their restaurants.

People need to get real about what Tupelo is and is not.

And contrary to Jack Reed Jr.'s thinking, Tupelo is just a little small southern town.

« oleput_guy wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 05:03 PM »
I suggest to bring in young people is to build a hip young apartment just for them- something retro and modern looking AND affordable!

Also Downtown Tupelo could add more restaurants like the popular ones: TGIFS, Buffalo Wild Wings, Hard Rock Cafe, etc. and also hometown restaurants that has that southern charm, yet keeping up with the modern times. Why we don't have Hard Rock Cafe here? It's Elvis' Birthplace! I can just see it on a corner somewhere downtown.

A dance club could be established. If it goes well and reaches its full capacity every, say, Fri-Saturdays nights, then they can add another dance club/lounge. Think of Beale Street in Memphis, but less bars/dance clubs. Senses on Poplar Ave. is a great example! They got great designs inside and the club is always jumping. We need something like that downtown.

« carlie.kollath wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 03:56 PM »
From the tone of the meeting, it's my impression that the apartment complex was called a thorn because the project has been on and off several times.

It's my understanding that the apartments themselves are not the problem. The problem is getting them developed and finding a model that will convince a developer to build them.

Make sense?

Any other questions from anyone?
« tupeloresident wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 03:28 PM »
I'm surprised to see apartments referred to as a thorn in the side. When I looked at a couple downtown last year, half the places I called had no vacancies, and the three or so I looked at claimed they rarely did. And a lot of towns our size don't even allow downtown apartments, or at least have changed their regulations so recently that they don't have many, and they're either very expensive or very cheap and crappy.
UM & MSU games to be shown live in Fairpark
by carlie.kollath
 Biz Buzz
10 hrs ago | 269 views | 5 5 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
event logo designed by Mabus Agency
event logo designed by Mabus Agency
slideshow

We’re live at a press conference in Fairpark where officials are gathered to announce an event called Pigskins in the Park.

Play-by-play details:

John Oxford of Renasant Bank and chairman of Tupelo Redevelopment Authority: We’re proud to announce that we’ll have Pigskins in the Park in October.

We’ll have two games shown on a jumbotron in Fairpark on Saturday, October 16. Both will be away games – Ole Miss at Alabama and Mississippi State at Florida.

Event is sponsored to Renasant Bank and Cellular South.

Mark Prince of Cellular South: The jumbotron will be 16 feet off the ground and will be 22 feet by 33 feet. Will be high resolution.

Cellular South also will have a Y’all Versus Us game the night before – Tupelo Golden Wave versus Panola played in Tupelo.

Debbie Brangenberg of the Downtown Tupelo Main Street Association: This is a great opportunity for downtown Tupelo. Our mission is to sustain the downtown experience. This is the epitome of collaboration.

Matt Wyatt, former QB for MSU and sports development director for Tupelo CVB: It is a big deal to have these games be a part of our downtown. Our CVB is proud to support it and hopefully promote it. We’ll promote this in the stadiums and in radio broadcasts.

Ole Miss at Alabama and MSU at Florida are huge games. This will be the first event of its kind and we’re proud to be a part of it.

John Oxford – Tupelo Quality of Life helping with this event. Mabus Agency did the logo.

Comcast will be the provider of the images. Many downtown merchants and restaurants will participant in the event. Will have booths set up in Fairpark for the events and will sell food.

Event ends. Several “hotty toddys” ring out in the crowd.

Read more in Friday’s Daily Journal.


comments (5)
« gr8dad wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 06:19 PM »
With that many UM and MSU fans in one place, it'd be a shame if somebody didn't teach them how to play American grid-iron football.
« TupeloGeek wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 01:04 PM »
Hotty Toddy!
« beautymotif wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 12:03 PM »
Hooray! One more reason to love living here!
« carlie.kollath wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 11:59 AM »
The city's facebook page has more pictures:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/City-of-Tupelo/171003494048
« carlie.kollath wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 11:57 AM »
Here's the link to the press release and photo on Matt Wyatt's blog:

http://tupelosportsblog.com/2010/09/02/pigskins-in-the-park-coming-october-16th/
Magazine names Tupelo's top young professionals
by carlie.kollath
 Biz Buzz
1 day 2 hrs ago | 534 views | 7 7 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

Many of our tweeps, friends and Biz Buzz interviewees on this list. Congrats!

Excerpts of a press release from Legend Publishing, which publishes Greater Tupelo Magazine:

TUPELO, Miss. – Tupelo’s  “40 and under” set of professionals in the area have been recognized for their contributions to Tupelo and twenty have been named as “Tupelo’s Top 20 Young Professionals.” 

The award was organized by Greater Tupelo Magazine, which took nominations for professionals between the ages of 21 and 40, had them judged by an independent panel of business professionals and is recognizing these winners for their extraordinary on-the-job performance by a person, their community involvement and their recognitions.  

“We received many nominations for outstanding young professionals,” stated Wesley Wells, owner of Legend Publishing.  “The twenty chosen are just a sample of the fine young business people that work actively in our community everyday.”        

    The winners include:

  • Julee Brown, WTVA/WLOV
  • Carman Jones, BancorpSouth
  • Brent Waldrop, BancorpSouth
  • Keri McMillin, Comcast Spotlight
  • Rachel Marie Pierce, Waide and Associates
  • Harry Rayburn, Main Street Family Dentistry
  • Joshua Simpson, Hilton Garden Inn
  • Stacy W. Spearman, Renasant Bank
  • Anna Freeman Wyatt, City of Tupelo
  • Neal McCoy, Tupelo Convention and Visitors Bureau
  • Karen C. Keeney, Architecture South
  • Bruce Patel, ABRMP Hotel Management
  • Jeff Overstreet, Renasant Bank
  • Jennie Bradford Curlee, Community Development Foundation
  • Gunner Goad, AT&T
  • Louis Conley, Renasant Bank
  • Carey Snyder, Snyder and Company
  • Amy Goff Nash, CellularSouth
  • Shane Hooper, Success Learning Inc.
  • Teresa Floyd, Sprint Print

comments (7)
« mahler wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 05:15 PM »
Are all these folks under 40? I would have sworn some of the guys were way past that. Maybe they should consider a little botox.
« JoshMabus wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 02:37 PM »
Congrats to all the winners! Glad to count most of them as friends!
« yorkbob wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 11:06 AM »
Ha Ha, beautymotif! You are so right. I barely made the cutoff myself. But, I am humbled, honored and thrilled to have been named. Thanks to all who gave me a thumbs up. Appreciate ya! ---Amy Goff Nash
« beautymotif wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 10:01 AM »
I think we need to verify some birth certificates. lol
« WLJ wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 09:16 AM »
WTFDude: I agree.

What is noteworthy about Anna Freeman Wyatt doing a mediocre job in an unnecessary position?

And Robert Hall is definitely over 40!
« WTFDude wrote on Thursday, Sep 02 at 08:44 AM »
@sandlot: I'm pretty sure that Robert Hall is over 40!

And "Anna Freeman Whyatt" in her position as Tupelo's Communications Director?

Give me a break!!

« sandlot1959 wrote on Wednesday, Sep 01 at 07:51 PM »
Two names are suspiciously absent from this list...where are the names of Jack Marshall and Robert Hall? Well, maybe Jack is too old....
RSS Feeds