Childers: I want to be part of the health care solution
by Patsy R. Brumfield/NEMS Daily Journal
12 months ago | 1368 views | 10 10 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
U.S. Rep. Travis Childers said he's looking for a health care reform proposal to support.

But it's got to cut costs, eliminate waste, stop penalizing people with pre-existing conditions and reward personal responsibility.

"If the Senate offers a better bill, I am not opposed to that," said the conservative Democrat from Booneville during an hour-long districtwide telephone conference Tuesday night.

Some 7,230 people listened in, and 17 callers asked questions of Childers, who's serving his first full two-year term in the House.

The conversation was civil and topics ranged widely through the hour-plus event. Callers came from Hernando to Tupelo.

Off the bat, Childers said he doesn't support a House bill, HR 3200, which has been worked on by three committees.

Among the answers from Childers:

- He won't support any legislation that includes funding for abortions.

- Insurance exchanges, where private companies offer options, may bring competition to help lower premiums.

- Care must taken not to hurt small businesses with onerous mandates.

- Illegal aliens should not be covered, period.

As for requiring individual coverage, Childers said he thinks government mandates have merit to avoid treating people in expensive emergency room settings, when all they really needed was a doctor's visit.

"We have to put some personal responsibility on people," he added.

How we get there isn't on the table yet, though, he said.

In the end, Childers said, "I would not vote for a bill I wouldn't agree to be part of.

"I want to be part of the solution."

Childers also he doesn't believe HR 3200 proposes so-called "death panels," but would allow Medicare to pay for a voluntary, patient-initiated consultation with a physician about end-of-life situations.

"It makes sense to pay for a doctor to sit own and help people make decisions," he said.

The congressman said he chose the telephone-style event because it's a fast way to reach many constituents throughout the 24-county district.

Childers and many other members of Congress are spending their August recess touring their districts. Many events focusing on health care reform have drawn large crowds of vocal constituents.

Contact Patsy R. Brumfield at (662) 678-1596 or patsy.brumfield@djournal.com. Read Patsy's blog, From the Front Row, on NEMS360.com.
comments (10)
« roscoe01 wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 03:03 PM »
I'm wondering when these Congressmen will realize, that regardless of your political affiliation, or personal beliefs, you were elected to represent US, not your party, or your own beliefs. The problem is we are letting them vote based on what they or their party wants, not what WE want. I don't care if he is the biggest Liberal on the planet, if we tell him to vote conservative, he better well do it, or he is no longer representing us, he is representing himself.
report abuse
« keithray wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 12:48 PM »
We don't need Congress to do anything about healthcare. First, they can't manage it. They can't even manage a budget. Their solutions are not solutions but more problems. If they would leave us alone and stop taxing us to death, we would all be doing a lot better and the country would be in much better shape.
report abuse
« amego wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 09:39 AM »
Rep. Childer when in Washington is Pelosi right hand man, when in Ms. he wants to act like a conservative. You can't be both.
report abuse
« Gryphon wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 09:26 AM »
Other members of Congress may be "spending their August recess touring their districts", but Childers isn't one of them. That is unless Israel is in his district!

Also, I was unaware that Mr. Childers' district is so vast that he just couldn't arrange for at least one face to face meeting with his constituents, but rather has to rely on tele-conferences in order to cover it all.

The bottom line is that he's AFRAID to meet face to face with his constituents. He wouldn't be able to control the questions in such a forum.

I voted for him because I thought he was a good man, but he's proven me wrong and he'll not get another vote from me.
report abuse
« msyankee wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 09:20 AM »
Any bill that does not specify that abortion cannot be paid with government funds will be covered. The bill does not have to list things that are covered or it would be a 5,000 page bill.

The whole bill should be scrapped and begin with simple bills that all can read and understand.

First, pass meaningful tort reform. Yes I know the argument is that would only save 1%. However that does not take into account all the test Drs have to preform to protect themselves from the trial lawyers.

I keep hearing about the greedy insurance companies, they are not nearly as greedy as the trial lawyers. Insurance companies do have to take risk to cover health care cost. Trial lawyers only have to exploit clients.

Pass a bill to send all illegal aliens back to their homeland. The government says there are too many to send back..You do it one illegal at a time. If the government will take action to make sure they cannot work then many will return on their own, especially if they think the government is serious.

Stop making insurance companies pay for un-insured people.

Mr. Childers, work to recend the stimilus spending, get the government out of the banking and automotive business. This congress is already spending $1.85 for every dollar it collects. Mississippi has to live within their means, US government should do the same.

The stimilus bill is killing jobs in Mississippi. Yes I know it scares people who loose their job to worry about health insurance.

You want those that loose their jobs to be able to keep their insurance? How will they pay?

Make job creation your goal, not just send Mississippi a few paltry dollars.

We will have more tax revenue if congress will let free enterprise work.
report abuse
« InTheMiddle wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 09:18 AM »
It seems that Childers' trip to Israel is an all expense paid vacation and pleasure trip paid for a lobbying agent for Israel. This would probably be illegal if he was to take such a trip to an American vacation destination paid for by a lobbyist. You know that Israel expects something in return for their investment!
report abuse
« InTheMiddle wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 09:14 AM »
From Rep. Childers previous comments, it seems that he believes that Israel is one of his constituents. In fact, his loyalty to them may be greater than his loyalty to the good people of District 1 in Mississippi. Rep Childers was not sent to Washington to represent the people of Israel. They do a very good job of that themselves and need no additional help. His loyalty does not need to be to Speaker Pelosi or Rep. Frank either. I hope he will stand strong for his beliefs as he represents first and foremost the people of the first district of north Mississippi.
report abuse
« deltabluz wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 08:36 AM »
I just spoke to the congressman's Washington office. I was told he has a full schedule, however, none of those events will be open to the public.
report abuse
« doghaus wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 06:46 AM »
childers--you don't have the courage or decency to meet with the people who elected you. These are the same people who are going to run your a$$ off as soon as the next election----better cozy up to pelosi now---you are through
report abuse
« deltabluz wrote on Wednesday, Aug 19 at 06:45 AM »
Congressman Childers answered a series of soft ball question from a few screened callers (by the way, how WERE those callers chosen?) With only a few exceptions, he answered with platitudes and vagaries.

He did go on record as saying he will not vote for a bill that funds abortions, but did not go as far as to say whether he would vote for language that would specifically exclude any funding for abortion. He did say he opposes funding for illegal alien health care.

The most troubling statement from Congressman Childers is one Ms. Brumfield glosses over. The Congressman did NOT say he opposes HR3200. Instead, what he said repeatedly was that he "cannot support the current bill AS WRITTEN." Lots of wiggle room in there for Childers to wrestle with his conscience until he decides he has to vote for HR3200, imperfections and all, just as he did when the stimulus bill was being debated.

Ms. Brumfield also states the Congressman is spending the August recess touring his district. I was not aware the first district included Israel. How would the average constituent know what the Congressman is doing? To date, his office has not posted a schedule on his tax dollar supported website.

Also, nowhere on his website is there any mention of his stance on HR3200. He has consistently avoided making any specific public stand in opposition to HR3200 aside from the one that he "cannot support HR3200 as written."

What I heard last night was not an open exchange of ideas. What I heard was well orchestrated, very careful non-committal talk from a congressman who can't remember whether he serves the people of Mississippi or his party leaders.

report abuse