EDITORIAL: Mississippi craving
by NEMS Daily Journal
11 months ago | 370 views | 6 6 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The end of congressional work in a budget cycle usually sends a cascade of appropriations to the states for programmatic and some earmarked spending. Mississippi receives its share, and more, thanks to the work of the delegation and guarantees in law.

The heated criticism following passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act early this year fails to acknowledge Mississippi’s continuing dependence on federal funds for state government functions and for profits in the private sector.

While many criticize the amount of the federal deficit and the mounting U.S. debt – both valid concerns – those sums also represent billions of dollars spent in Mississippi through entitlements, earmarks, program funds and contracts, all linked to thousands of jobs.

Under ARRA, the nearly $800 billion recovery program, Mississippi is scheduled to receive $2.3 billion this year and in the next two budget cycles.

Hundreds of millions have been used to close gaps between Mississippi’s own declining revenue stream and state programs like education, health care and transportation whose work would be curtailed if not for the federal dollars.

Mississippi received about $354 million total for transportation – about $274 million for highway projects, including U.S. 78 and other roads in Northeast Mississippi.

Northeast Mississippi’s congressional delegation – Republican Sens. Thad Cochran and Roger Wicker and Democratic U.S. Rep. Travis Childers of Booneville – collectively have announced the release or approval of more than $500 million in appropriated funds for projects and contracts in our state in recent weeks.

The major institutional recipients include Mississippi State and the University of Mississippi for research and development.

Among transportation projects are U.S. 78 upgrades and $1.5 million for the Tupelo Major Thoroughfare Plan’s Northern Loop connector road from Belden to Barnes Crossing Road.

The federal role in rebuilding and recovery from Hurricane Katrina continues. Cochran earlier this month announced $439 million to restore and protect Mississippi's Barrier Islands, the chain that’s 12 miles offshore that’s a wilderness area and a protection against the full impact of storms rolling in from the Gulf of Mexico.

Mississippi would belly-up if not for federal spending, not just during recession but in normal economic cycles, too.

The two most widespread federally funded health care programs, Medicaid for children, the poor and the disabled, and Medicare for senior retirees, invest more than $6 billion in Mississippi each year.

In addition, $1.1 billion was spent in 2008 on some of the 213,000 veterans in Mississippi, and $431 million was paid in veterans’ pensions.

Everyone is free to criticize, but billions in that maligned spending come to Mississippi for productive purposes.

Do you know anyone whose income depends wholly or partly on federal funds?


comments (6)
« ultracreep wrote on Saturday, Sep 26 at 02:19 PM »
Defending our country from what? Iraq? They had nothing to do with the whole debacle. Not to mention terrorism is never ended by war. Never has in the whole course of human events. In fact, it makes anti-american sentiment overseas much worse, therefore, expanding the possibility for terrorism. I knew when Bush said they had WMDs he was a big fat liar, because we don't attack people who really have the bomb, because they would blow us, or at least something, up if we did. Ever ask yourself why we don't mess with North Korea? Because they REALLY DO have the bomb. Duh.
report abuse
« Mr.T wrote on Saturday, Sep 26 at 08:29 AM »
Mississippi RECEIVES a lot more money from the federal government every year than it GIVES.So it is US who sends the crumbs and get back a loaf.

Defending our country is one thing,but attacking an innocent country,and then attempting to occupy it is something else.There is still no connection between Iraq and our 911 attack.
report abuse
« VietNamVet wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 09:31 PM »
No, scar-strangled-banter, it is called PORK. Defending our country is a valid use of tax money, trying to buy votes is not.
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 08:42 PM »
Get real, most of the people in this state are unemployed or make so little they don't pay taxes anyway. I haven't exactly seen a huge tax base in this state, and looking at the revenue shortfalls (for years in a row might I add)it probably hasn't been a prosperous state since before the Civil War. If you were smart, and a lot of you are not...you wouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth. I'm so sick of hearing all this "pull yourselves up by your bootstraps" crap. Look down you dopes! You're barefoot!When this state comes in first in something other than poverty or obesity then you can gripe about the government and turn down its money, mkay?
report abuse
« msyankee wrote on Tuesday, Sep 22 at 11:48 AM »
Whoop-e-doo-doo, its called tax and sin,,i mean spend.

We work hard in Mississippi, pay our taxes, send it to Washington. Obama pays his czars, buys a couple of car companies, shut off water to 30,000 farmers to save a 2 inch worthless fish, takes Michelle to New York on a tax paid fun trip, sucks up to our enemies.etc.etc.etc

Then has the audacity to send up some crumbs and clain to be our savior.

It is well documented that we have always survived recessions faster without this regressive spending falsly called a stimilus..

The only stimilus we got is junk cars and czars.

PLEASE GOD, JUST GIVE US JIMMY CARTER BACK!
report abuse
« scar-strangled-banter wrote on Tuesday, Sep 22 at 09:07 AM »
It's called investment, and it's a better way to spend our money than destroying soverign nations.
report abuse