How they voted on Health Care
by The Associated Press
9 months ago | 2454 views | 16 16 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In this photo taken from pool video via APTN, the final vote the health care bill 3962 is shown as members of the house attend the vote on Saturday in Washington. (AP Photo/Pool)
In this photo taken from pool video via APTN, the final vote the health care bill 3962 is shown as members of the house attend the vote on Saturday in Washington. (AP Photo/Pool)
slideshow
House Roll Call: Health care

The Associated Press

A look at how Mississippi House members voted. The 220-215 roll call Saturday by which the House passed a Democratic-written health care bill.

A "yes" vote is a vote to pass the bill.

Voting yes were 219 Democrats and 1 Republican.

Voting no were 39 Democrats and 176 Republicans.

X denotes those not voting.

Present denotes those who voted they were "present" at the time of the vote but did not vote yes or no on the issue.

MISSISSIPPI

Democrats — Childers, N; Taylor, N; Thompson, Y.

Republicans — Harper, N.

House Roll Call: How they voted on abortion issue

The Associated Press

A look at how Mississippi House members voted.

The 240-194 roll call Saturday by which the House voted to prohibit federal funding of abortions in a Democratic-written health care bill.

A "yes" vote is a vote to prohibit federal funding of abortions.

Voting yes were 64 Democrats and 176 Republicans.

Voting no were 194 Democrats and 0 Republicans.

X denotes those not voting.

Present denotes those who voted they were "present" at the time of the vote but did not vote yes or no on the issue.

MISSISSIPPI

Democrats — Childers, Y; Taylor, Y; Thompson, N.

Republicans — Harper, Y.

Health care bill clears House by narrow margin; legislation now moves to the Senate

WASHINGTON — In a victory for President Barack Obama, the Democratic-controlled House narrowly passed landmark health care legislation to expand coverage to tens of millions who lack it and place tough new restrictions on the insurance industry. Republican opposition was nearly unanimous.

The 220-215 vote Saturday night cleared the way for the Senate to begin a long-delayed debate on the issue that has come to overshadow all others in Congress.

A triumphant Speaker Nancy Pelosi likened the legislation to the passage of Social Security in 1935 and Medicare 30 years later — and Obama issued a statement saying, "I look forward to signing it into law by the end of the year."

"It provides coverage for 96 percent of Americans. It offers everyone, regardless of health or income, the peace of mind that comes from knowing they will have access to affordable health care when they need it," said Rep. John Dingell, the 83-year-old Michigan lawmaker who has introduced national health insurance in every Congress since succeeding his father in 1955.

In the run-up to a final vote, conservatives from the two political parties joined forces to impose tough new restrictions on abortion coverage in insurance policies to be sold to many individuals and small groups. They prevailed on a roll call of 240-194.

Minority Republicans cataloged their objections across hours of debate on the 1,990-page, $1.2 trillion legislation.

"We are going to have a complete government takeover of our health care system faster than you can say, 'this is making me sick,'" said Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich.
comments (16)
« dawginheat wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 10:31 PM »
I love it when conservatives bash liberals for getting their information from NBC or Huffington Post, while at the same time they use info from FoxNews and that freak Glenn Beck.

I just want to know when Republicans are going to stop fighting a Democratic-written health care plan, and start trying to come up with one themselves (or even just major reforms to the current state of health care). Oh, wait.....that'll never happen.
report abuse
« BFD wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 08:57 PM »
Mr. T, Don't send your kids where you went to school either. you ended one of your sentences with a prepositon. LMAO
report abuse
« BFD wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 08:49 PM »
Mr.T, you're fat. did i get the grammar right in that sentence? maybe your public option will help you with your weight problem and stupidity.
report abuse
« sandlot1959 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 07:38 PM »
oh and about your Childers comment...many of the people who voted for him knew of his conservative views so it should not be a surprise that he opposes bills that contain far left ideals....no I really believe the people that were paying attention got exactly what they thought they would with Mr Childers...However, I believe if he switches over to the GOP, he would be a shoe in for re-election....
report abuse
« sandlot1959 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 07:32 PM »
Boy Mr T.. find myself agreeing with you on some issues and NOT on others...what a great country we live in...:) The sky IS falling on most of our social programs...how in the world can we institute and fund an entirely new insurance program when we already have one that is on the verge of collapse according to every study and most federal politicians? Further, the fed plans to make cuts to a plan that is already on the verge of collapse? HUH? If this congress has known about waste in the medicare system since they took control of congress, why are they still sitting on fixing the waste instead of getting to it? Cutting Medicare will only create bigger problems for a program that is already broke...we MUST fix SS/Medicare before adding ANY new programs...how could these people POSSIBLY believe that starting a new program during a financial crisis is the right thing to do? And when you add into the mix that all of the illegal aliens will be allowed into the system, you have an absolute debacle...No this program might not cause the sky to fall but you can expect at least a massive amount of bird droppings in your eye...
report abuse
« Mr.T wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 05:10 PM »
I stand by my statement about Mr. Childers. If I buy a Ford, I expect it to have a Ford engine in it, not a Chevrolet engine in it. If I had wanted a Chevrolet engine, I would have bought a Chevrolet to start with.

I think that it is still too early to nitpick this bill to death yet. I think that there will be many changes to this bill if and when Mr. Obama signs it. I do not expect any bill to be perfect. None of our social programs are. Before Social Security,Medicare, or even unemployment insurance were passed, they all had their Republican critics. But to their dismay, the sky has not fallen yet. As we look around today, how many of us would want to eliminate these programs? Are there any of us, or our own families that have not benefited from these programs at one time or another? I think not.

I believe that our future generations will not want to return to a time when there there was no national health care plans available either.
report abuse
« sandlot1959 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 03:55 PM »
Mr T equating a political vote with "religion" is hilarious...Esteban and BFD are the only ones here in touch with what is really going on...Sure you can read the Huffington Post or Daily Koz and come away with the opinion that a majority of Americans are for "this type" of health care reform...Now look at a non-partisan poll such as Rasmussun and you'll get a different picture...the reason the bluedog dems are holding this up is because they know their constituents-even those FOR this type of healthcare reform-DONT want such things as the "public option" or abortion included in the bill...ultracreep sadly believes that a good reason for the public option is because the insurance companies try to protect themselves--imagine any business with THAT attitude...further, he thinks the federal government would do a better job of protecting and treating the health of the American people THAN the insurance companies...Just one glance at our Social Security/Medicare system puts an abrupt halt to any such notion...I've been reading the house bill and one section allows the "secretary" to establish "waiting lists" to reduce costs...how about that, already planning for the system to function as it does in Canada and England...and that stipulation comes very early in the bill and it is chock full of things that even the creep and his protege scar wouldnt like...these two guys need to be able to draw a distinction between a hatred for the Republicans and support of a bill that would have catostrophic results for this country...If this bill DOES miraculously pass through the senate, we will be saddled with yet another underfunded and abused national insurance program that much like medicare, we won't be able to count on...
report abuse
« scar-strangled-banter wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 12:46 PM »
Preach it, Creep! Why don't you run for congress?
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 12:23 PM »
I wonder why people are convinced that if they need cancer treatment or a transplant that their private insurance companies will pay for it. They are in the business of finding reasons NOT to pay for your bills. Most people's transplants will not be covered by private insurance, and if you get cancer, they will cover the bare minimum and then drop you for your pre existing condition. Do not fool yourselves, the insurance companies will be the big losers if a decent health care plan passes, and they spend a lot of money and lobby HARD to scare you and confuse you because the status quo means big money for them, and the average consumer is the loser. There are plenty of people who've been thrust into bankruptcy when someone in their family has come down with a serious illness and the insurance which they paid for and depended on dropped them or refused to cover most of it. As for the people without insurance at all,although they will patch you up at an emergency room, they will not treat you for cancer for free, they turn you away to die.
report abuse
« Mr.T wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 11:30 AM »
Where did you learn to type and spell at? I want to make sure that my grandchildren will NEVER attend there.LOL
report abuse
« BFD wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 11:24 AM »
if you look the majority of dems voted for including abortion in the bill. do you think the majority of americans are for covering abortion with the public option. the dems are out of touch with american people and it will be reflected in 2010.
report abuse
« BFD wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 11:11 AM »
i believe the majority of americans are against the dems form of health care reform. stop buying into the dem propaganda republicans don't won't reform. we do just not reform that gives pols in dc more power over the people. many of barak's voters are having buyers remorse. they didn't vote for him but voted against bush. now they are suffering for it. dems would also tell you most americans are pro gay marriage and it has been proven by voters 31 times that is not true. stay off the moveon.org and nbc(national barack channel)and do some of your own research and you;ll see how stupid you are
report abuse
« Mr.T wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 10:34 AM »
If 75% of America was against a national health plan, Obama would never have been elected by such a wide majority. It was something that he campaigned very hard for. I don't know where you are getting your national news from, but it is time for you to look elsewhere.
report abuse
« esteban1 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 10:01 AM »
I think Mr Childers voted the way 75% of Miss and America would like to see them vote. Some people have common sense and good luck getting a transplant or major surgery for you or a family member if this thing passes. They will have everyone hooked up to electronic monitors in 3 years at the rate they are trying to take control...
report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 09:39 AM »
Yep,Childers is definitely a faux-crat.
report abuse
« Mr.T wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 07:34 AM »
Mr. Childers, You are a traitor to the Democratic party. If I had wanted a Representative who would agree with the Republican party, then I would have voted FOR a Republican. You should never again campaign as a Democrat. A Republican or a Independent yes, but not a Democrat. A person of the Jewish faith does NOT pastor a Baptist church.
report abuse