Pit bull's young victim identified
by Errol Castens/NEMS Daily Journal
9 months ago | 2490 views | 14 14 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
NEW ALBANY - The 16-month-old victim of a pit bull attack was identified Friday as Destiny Marie Knox from Union County.

Her body was taken to Jackson for an autopsy while sheriff's deputies investigated the killing, which occurred Thursday night when the child was attacked by a pit bull at her baby sitter's mobile home.

"It's devastating anytime you have the loss of a child. Especially in these circumstances, where the child was mutilated, it's devastating," said Sheriff's Investigator Anthony Anderson.

The mauling took place in a mobile home park on County Road 87 in the Martintown community. According to investigators, the dog normally was kept chained near the house but had slipped out of its collar as family members were bringing in groceries and Destiny was on the floor nearby.

"The dog followed them inside the house," said Chief Deputy Jimmy Whitten. "When they opened the door, the dog followed them inside the house."

The dog quickly attacked the toddler, who was not left unattended as previously reported.

A 19-year-old man in the house tried to intervene by hitting and stabbing the animal, but when emergency responders arrived, the child was already dead.

Her identity was released Friday morning by Coroner Mark Golding.

Dog killed

Deputies shot the dog - reportedly one of five dogs, all pit bulls, that the baby sitter owned.

"When the deputies arrived, the dog had to be put down at the scene. The dog was acting vicious," Whitten said.

Investigators found no signs that the dog had ever been mistreated.

"This dog was very healthy, very stout. It was well-kept, well-groomed," Whitten said.

Investigator Roger Garner added, "It didn't have telltale scars where stitches have been put in it, like they've been used for fighting."

Neighbors said the woman's dogs had always been kept restrained. One neighbor, who wouldn't give his name, went so far as to say of the killer dog, "It wasn't vicious."

Holly Whaley, who also lives in the same mobile home park, never saw the dogs off their chains, but she feared them nevertheless.

"I walk around the area in morning times sometimes, but I'm too scared to walk down that way because them dogs are out there," she said.

Calls for action

Whitten said Union County had not had a human fatality from dog attack in his memory, but he and fellow officers said vicious dogs are a frequent problem for area residents. While a county leash law wouldn't have saved Destiny - because the attack was inside - it would deal with other problems, he said.

Anderson said he'd favor a ban on pit bull dogs and other vicious breeds.

"Every dog bite case I've worked at the hospital has involved a pit bull," he said.

Garner said his experience has been similar.

"When I was at Tupelo and we had attacks by dogs, almost 100 percent of the time it was by a pit bull or some pit mix. It's just the nature of the dog," he said.

"I think something needs to be done," Anderson said. "I think the people's voices need to be heard so that this never occurs again."

Whitten added, "I think the Legislature needs to look at this."

Contact Errol Castens at (662) 281-1069 or errol.castens@djournal.com.
comments (14)
« APBTAInc wrote on Thursday, Jan 07 at 08:43 PM »
From Brent Toellner's KC Dog Blog:

1) Fatal incidents are extremely rare. With about 75 million dogs in the US, and 32 fatal dog attacks each year, they are such a statistical anomoly that decisions on "breed" aggression should not be based on such rare incidents. By comparison, the US Population is 300 million (4x the dog population) and saw over 16,000 murders (500x the number of dog-related deaths). If only humans could be close to as safe as dogs.

2) When you look at fatal incidents, the circumstances surrounding them usually follow a couple of different criteria that will become obvious when you read. It is my hope that by seeing the circumstances behind the attacks we can eliminate many future attacks so these tragedies can be avoided.

3) If people track bite information only by breed, without tracking the information by circumstances, the only correlation they can come up with for attacks is by breed and have missed the most obvious conclusion.

4) The vast majority of my data, including breed ID, comes from media sources, so they come with the inherant ID issues that come from visual breed identification and from media mis-reporting.

5) The difference in media exposure for the different breeds of dogs is extremely notable.

Full report here:

http://btoellner.typepad.com/kcdogblog/2010/01/2009-dog-bite-fatalities-final-report.html
report abuse
« APBTAInc wrote on Thursday, Jan 07 at 08:40 PM »
report abuse
« corinnabay wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 03:38 PM »
The people who oppose pit bull regulation are BREEDERS and DOG FIGHTERS who make a lot of money from pit bulls (and they don't pay taxes either!)

They DON'T CARE that kids, adults, the elderly, pets, are being slaughtered by pit bulls.

Look at dogsbite.org

How long are we going to let fighting dogs like pit bulls ruin our lives so that a tiny group can make money from pit bulls?
report abuse
« khills wrote on Monday, Nov 09 at 01:08 AM »
"According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study, 68% of the attacks upon children, 82% of the attacks upon adults, 65% of the deaths, and 68% of the maimings. In more than two-thirds of the cases included in the study, the life-threatening or fatal attack was apparently the first known dangerous behavior by the animal in question. According to Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes were responsible for 65% of the canine homicides that occurred during a period of 24 years in the USA.

http://nems360.com/pages/full_story/push?secure_comments=true&content_instance=4368273&need_to_add=true&id=4368273

More Stats on dog attacks by breeds:

"As in recent years, Rottweilers were the most

commonly reported breed involved in fatal attacks, followed by pit bull-type dogs (Table 1). Together, these 2 breeds were involved in approximately 60% of human deaths"

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dog50.pdf

And here is link on chained dogs:

"Here's a chilling fact from government statistics: Chained dogs kill as many children as do firearms, and more than falls from trees, playground equipment and fireworks accidents put together. "

http://www.unchainyourdog.org/news/050803LoadedWeapon.htm

This 2007 reports 60% fatal dog attack was pits:

http://www.dogsbite.org/bite-fatalities-2007.htm
report abuse
« tiggypooh04 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 12:54 AM »
I can not believe some folks are comparing and getting angry about their precious dogs over the loss of a blessed child. I pray the next child is not yours or mine.
report abuse
« jylliw wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 10:23 PM »
If you want FACTS go here. Enough of this argument about PB's. I see that I was wrong about the amount of fatalaties from PB's it is only 2/3. Rotts and Husky-types also are are problem. I know from experience that you can be attacked by a herd of toy dogs, but your life is not in danger...THAT is the difference, people.

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf
report abuse
« jakkkka wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 04:54 PM »
IGNORANCE,IGNORANCE. Please spread it as fast as you can before its to late. The Anderson person is either an idiot or just taken out of context. There is no way all the bite cases he has worked have been pitbulls, they are actually quite rare compared to most other breed. Its just the random few get a lot of attention because it is what sells news papers. There were five chanined up in the back of the yard, it is a recipe for disaster no matter what the breed is. Come people your brain is there for a reason, use it.
report abuse
« 36ford wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 02:46 PM »
This breed of dog, and all like it should be destroyed from off the earth. Also the owner of any dog that would attack a child, should be prosceuted to the fullest extent of the law!
report abuse
« midtownwrecker wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 01:53 PM »
as a former owner of pit bulls, I have

always been quick to defend the breed.

my grandson was attacked by a mixed breed

dog about 4 years ago and this dog had

absolutely no bull dog in him. After all

was said and done we found that the child

had teased the dog with food. any dog no

matter what size or breed will attack

when provoked. I do not think the breed

should be banned, i think this is just

plain stupid.There are the good and bad

in ( dog kind) as well as human.

I say there should be more responsible

pet owners. more responsible parents also

What responsible mother puts her child in

a home that has 6 of any type of dog?

People should be educated when it comes to

pets of any type.

report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 01:03 PM »
Just because a dog looks well fed and groomed does not mean that the dog has been well treated. People psychologically and physically torment dogs (especially pit bulls) in ways that don't always show. I think these people should be charged with some sort of negligence, because it's clear to me,even as former pit bull owner, that if you have five pits tethered in the back yard, you are not a proper owner and are probably up to no good. Pit bulls are not human agressive normally AT ALL. Dog aggression and human agression are mutually exclusive. Dogs who are chained up 90 percent of the time are NOT socialized AT ALL. Not to mention, half the time, when I see these reports, the dogs they are talking about are not true pits, but mixed breeds, Boxers, American Bulldogs, and sometimes even Boston Terriers.Most law enforcement and average folks around here wouldn't know a Cane Corso, or a million other hefty breeds from a pit bull anyway, but pits will continue to garner the hate and catch the wrath. On the news the other night the newscaster actually said,"Aberdeen Humane Society is getting a new enclosure to house pit bulls and other vicious dogs." Pit bulls can be vicious, like any other breed, but they are not NATURALLY vicious. There are just a lot of ignorant idiots who cannot handle large intelligent dogs, who get them, raise them wrong, and when they turn, blame the dog. It can't possibly be that they're just idiots, now can it?
report abuse
« bulldawg225 wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 12:08 PM »
my best friend had 2 pitbulls. They were very friendly towards his friends. BUT, they hated other dogs/cats/etc. with a passion. My friend was always on alert. A few times they got loose and he found them with neighbors dogs and cats in their mouths. (could have been a small child too)They finally died and he said he would never have another pitbull again because of their nature. Even though they were friendly to us in his home,they were a threat to anything outside. Its in their blood.
report abuse
« jylliw wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 10:10 AM »
Wrong. This is an aggressive breed that - like the officer said - is responsible for almost 100 percent of the attacks on humans. They are also a constant danger to other dogs. People need to realize that just because they "like" these dogs, it is not acceptable to keep them in proximity to other people and pets. You are right, however, about the tethering of any dog; it is a problem waiting to happen. When you mis the attitude of a Terrier and the bulk and strength of a Mastiff there is an attack machine.

Go ahead and tell me how I am an ignorant buffoon, but the facts are on my side, not yours.
report abuse
« khills wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 10:04 AM »
I agree totally with stantonb. What a horrible tragedy and a horrific way to die. Horrible beyond words.

However, the deputy makes a statement about this being the breed and it is the humans who breed and raise the dogs. The dog most likely to become agressive from all studies is a chained dog. Especially and unaltered male. The dog has testoterone and no outlet---no exercise--he can smell females and can't get to them. He sees people and can't get to them. Any strong breed needs to be socialized as puppies. They should be neutered and NEVER chained up. Ownership of pit bulls or even rottie, chows, akitas--should be by people who understand strong breeds and are willing to exercise, socialize, neuter, and NOT chain.

Specific pit bull or agressive breed legislation is not the answer to the pit bull problem. This is a wonderful breed when bred by responsible breeders and owned by responsible educated owners. When people start breeding for fighting, they breed for agressive and not for good temperament. When people get them to fight, they don't socialize them for normal society. When people get them to chain up and scare people away as security, they are raising an agressive animal whether they want to or not by how they treat the dog.

Legislation should target the humans and not the dogs. We should have strong laws that go after and put out of business the fighting people. We should have strong animal welfare and spay/neuter laws that would prevent people from chaining up animals in their yards where they can get loose or an innocent child could come around them.

Pit bulls have been used even as therapy dogs. Bred for temperament and raised by knowledgeable owners, they can be one of the most loving and loyal breeds. But dog fighting and chaining as a security system has developed dogs that stay in the headlines.

This Pit bull agressive dog problem is a human problem. As a society, we need to change. Dog fighting should be stopped completely. Chaining dogs or leaving dogs in little pens to become agressive and frustrated and miserable needs to be stopped.
report abuse
« stantonb wrote on Saturday, Nov 07 at 09:10 AM »


This is such a tragic story, my heart goes out to the families involved and for the beautiful young life that was ended...

but...

Really? More ignorant pit bull hate? The real problem is in the story...he was usually kept on a chain outside...leashing or tethering dogs outside for their entire lives is not an acceptable form of habitation...

The dog had no contact with humans...btw sheriff animal expert...there is no such thing as a vicious breed...just ignorant humans who get dogs they shouldn't have and have no idea how to care for...

I am a pit bull owner...my dog is well socialized, gets exercise, discipline and affection...

Read any dog behavior book and you'll notice the first key in working out bad behaviors is EXERCISE...tethering a dog outside permanently ALWAYS causes behavior problems in dogs...they should have taken the owners out too for causing the tragedy through their negligence...

The short explanation for this dog's behavior is that Human Babies and Children don't register in dog's minds as human initially...they look, act and smell different than adults...you have to teach them this fact quickly and let them know their place in correlation to children in the family...that was problem 1...they had dogs and babies in the same place and hadn't done their homework...
report abuse