Inside Mississippi State Sports



Stansbury: 'Double Disappointment'
by bradlocke
 Inside Mississippi State Sports
5 months ago | 893 views | 7 7 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

The pain is still fresh for Mississippi State coach Rick Stansbury. It was evident in his voice and his words on this morning’s SEC coaches teleconference. He defended his team’s NCAA résumé and said he has not – and could not – receive a satisfactory explanation for the Bulldogs not receiving an NCAA tournament berth. They will play Jackson State at 9 p.m. Tuesday in the first round of the NIT.

“No. 1, nobody could give me none anyway,” Stansbury said. “That’s No. 1. I haven’t received any (explanation), to answer your question. No. 2, there’s nothing anybody could tell me. And No. 3, it don’t matter.”

Stansbury went on to defend his scheduling – State’s strength of schedule was in the low 100s before Sunday; now it’s 74th – and cited road games against Houston (win), San Diego (win) and Western Kentucky (loss), as well as games versus UCLA (Wooden Classic in Anaheim, Calif.) and DePaul (SEC/Big East Challenge in Tampa), both wins.

“First off, I don’t understand the strength of schedule. How some of these teams from these smaller leagues have such a good strength of schedule, but we play 16 SEC games. And besides our 16 SEC games, we had eight games non-conference away from home. Away from home. I don’t know if there’s another BCS team in America that did that.”

So to get snubbed after losing that heartbreaker to Kentucky in Sunday’s SEC title game, it was a “double disappointment,” as Stansbury put it.

“I’m sure you witnessed the game, everybody listening witnessed the game, so you know what a heartbreaker that was. To not be one of the 64 teams was a double heartbreaker.”

He later added, “It’s not always fair, that’s life. But no one can ever convince me and tell me we’re not one of the best 64 teams in the country. Based on numbers, based on committees, and based on politics sometimes, that’ll always happen. And that’s the way it is.”

OTHER COACHES ON MSU: Florida was a bubble team that got the nod over State. UF coach Billy Donovan said he wasn’t really surprised by that.

“I’m not going to sit here and make a case for our team over anybody else,” he sad. “Mississippi State’s in our league, and I think Rick did a terrific job with his team, and they made it all the way to the finals there and probably are deserving to be in the tournament. I think the one thing we really tried to do, I know for myself and with the commissioner (Mike Slive) and C.M. Newton (an NCAA selection committee chairman), there was a real, real strong push, at least from us, to really take our schedule to really a different level.”

Florida’s strength of schedule is ranked 36th in the country, according to RealTimeRPI.com.

On MSU, Donovan added, “They played unbelievably coming down the stretch and probably no question can make a case for being in there.”

Kentucky coach John Calipari continued to stump for MSU, even after the fact. “Obviously, Mississippi State they’re saying now they had to beat us, which is crazy because they took us to overtime in two games. And if we’re the No. 2-seeded team in the whole tournament, I don’t know what that means. Well, they could’ve done more out of league, and they could’ve done this – but they won the division.”

comments (7)
« JCK_MsuFan wrote on Monday, Mar 15 at 02:37 PM »
Dawgz09, your comment was awesome. I couldn't agree with you more, and it will never change. Didn't matter what State did in that Sec Championship game, all Dykes and Nessler could talk about was how great Kentucky was (particularly Cousins and Wall). They even had the nerve after that heartbreaker to say, well Mississippi State just ran into a wall! The worst part is it's with all sports and not just basketball.
« tupelojoe81 wrote on Monday, Mar 15 at 01:46 PM »
after all of this though, I’m still happy with the 65 team bracket…..could you imagine how many more mid major teams and how watered down this thing could get with 96 teams??? I used to be a fan of expanding, but really if you look at it, only 4 teams got the complete shaft in this deal. MSU, Va Tech, Illinois, ASU……the 1 seeds for the NIT.

The only other thing to do if you are going to expand is have an Automatic bid for Regular Season Champs as well as the tourney champs…..some mid major teams get the shaft for winning the regular season and cant pull out the tourney.

« tupelojoe81 wrote on Monday, Mar 15 at 01:43 PM »
nice rant there Dawgz08......Ron Polk was the only man from MSU who ever challenged the NCAA, but since it was ONLY baseball, they didnt listen. Rick, Greg or Dan have to be the ones to say something. Templeton was a puppet to the NCAA as well, he never would say anything.
« Dawgz09 wrote on Monday, Mar 15 at 01:01 PM »
BlazerDawg, don't get too excited. They(ESPN,CBS, and the other money hungry SOB's) will continue to overlook Mississippi State as long as you and I live. To them, Stansbury is just a poor little man with no case, "You shouldn't have lost to Rider." Maybe not, or maybe we should relocate our school to a richer state. We have been getting ____ed on all year and it's NEVER going to stop. We, the 2nd least fouling team in the country, get called for everthing when it counts most. Renardo Sidney gets punished for coming to Mississippi State and not Kentucky or Florida. Someone needs to grow some balls because there is nothing you or I can do about it. We just have to accept, as Mississippi State, we are going to have to win 30 games to get any recognition. After the selection show yesterday, they had Dick Vitale and Bobby Knight trying to explain why Virginia Tech and Illinois, got left out..even got those teams' coaches on the phone. WHO THE HELL STOOD UP FOR US? NO ONE! We were NEVER mentioned! That infuriates me but sadly, I'm used to it by now. If I was on this team, I would go into the NIT and try to win by 40 every game!
« BlazerDawg wrote on Monday, Mar 15 at 11:40 AM »
Sic'em Stans, you are exactly right, 'bout time someone starts standing up, I'm tired of this crap and if we don't stand up for ourselves who will, Slive? yea rite!
« mbdog wrote on Monday, Mar 15 at 11:34 AM »
Brad,

Could you please read and respond to my comment on your "Explaining MSU's Absence" blog entry?
« ezfreeze wrote on Monday, Mar 15 at 11:18 AM »
BL, talking about strength of schedule... It appears that your SOS changes the deeper you go into your conference tournament...

I am curious on what strength of schedule the committee was looking at when they decided to exclude MSU...

I personally think the SEC tournament should be started earlier or something... I can't imagine the close game against Kentucky had any bearing on MSU's chances maybe because it was so late in the determining factor...