Animal cruelty bill gets mixed feeling
by Emily Le Coz and Danza Johnson/NEMS Daily Journal
5 months ago | 748 views | 15 15 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
TUPELO – An attempt to make animal cruelty a felony in Mississippi has won the support of those closest to its helpless victims.

But not all animal lovers agree.

Senate Bill 2623 passed the full Senate in a 47-1 vote last week. If it becomes law, it’d make it a felony to maliciously “torture, mutilate, maim, burn, starve, disfigure or kill any domesticated dog or cat.” And it’d be punishable by a $10,000 fine and up to five years in prison.

Mississippi is one of only four states without a felony animal-cruelty law, according to the Humane Society of the United States. Idaho, North Dakota and South Dakota are the others.

Offenders now face misdemeanor charges that carry a maximum $1,000 fine and six months in jail.

The problem with weaker laws, said Tupelo-Lee Humane Society Director Debbie Hood, is that animal advocates and law-enforcement officials have little means to punish offenders. And Hood said she gets five to 10 abuse reports daily, some of which deal with multiple animals.

“Why even bother to prosecute if they’re not going to be punished for a crime? I think that’s what’s wrong with Mississippi,” Hood said. “These puppy mill breeders, there’s nothing we can do. In Mississippi, they would get a $50 fine, and they would have been told, ‘You can’t do that.’”

The bill now heads to the House.

State Rep. Steve Holland said he feels the bill will go through a lot of scrutiny in the House but thinks it will pass in some form. For Holland, making animal cruelty a felony is an issue for him.

“I don’t believe in mistreating any animals and have taken in quite a few strays over the years,” said Holland. “But we need to be careful of making felons out of people. And that’s my issue. I’d like to see it be a misdemeanor with an increased fine instead.”

Lee County Justice Court Judge Rickey Thompson deals with crime against animals often in his court. Because of the minimal consequences, Thompson said people often ignore animal cruelty laws. If the new law passes, Thompson said the judicial system will finally have a real weapon to fight against such crimes.

“This is a positive move in the right direction,” said Thompson. “We need to make people realize if they knowingly and maliciously harm an animal they will be severely punished and not just slapped on the wrist.”

But the Mississippi Canine Coalition and other animal groups oppose SB 2623, calling it vague and unconstitutional. While their members say they support efforts to crack down on animal cruelty, they dislike the current proposal.

“What good is it if it’s going to be thrown out of court because it’s unconstitutional?” said Tupelo resident Tere Woody, a member of the American Kennel Club and an opponent of the bill.

At issue is a section of the current law dealing with animal seizure in cases of abuse. Woody and others say that unless a new bill changes that section, it’s basically worthless.

“The seizure portion of the law has never been challenged but we feel it’s unconstitutional,” said Linda Chance, legislative chair of the Mississippi Canine Coalition. “This allows people’s animals, their property, to be taken by the government before they get a trial unless they can pay a bond. That’s not right. It’s taking money from poor people.”

Attempts at crafting a constitutionally fit animal-cruelty bill have been in the works for years, Woody added, but never make it through the Legislature.

In any case, she said, SB 2623 clearly isn’t the way to proceed.

But Lee County Sheriff Jim Johnson said he supports the bill and wants it to pass.

“We deal with animal cruelty a lot more than you’d think about, but we’re not able to penalize it much,” Johnson said. “This law will put a little more bite in it. This law will make you think twice before you do something.”
comments (15)
« americasgone wrote on Thursday, Mar 04 at 10:41 AM »
Hey tupelolady don't be such a nimrod okay. Of course animals do not have souls. Be real. But that doesn't mean I want the shelter or anyone else killing them. When you get all hysterical like that you don't make much sense, if any. I do not think animals should be mistreated by cruel people or by the shelter. Let's face it. The shelter in Tupelo has always been a dump. I have been to shelters in many states over the years. The Tupelo one is among the worst. If the fools who run the shelter would not charge so much for adoptions they could relieve their overcrowding and therefore not have to kill so many animals under the guise of compassion. Every time I see that MS. Hood on TV I want to vomit. She is so full of herself and that is probably why she is so rude to people. If that woman ever cracks a smile her face will shatter.
report abuse
« tupelolady wrote on Saturday, Feb 13 at 10:04 AM »
This law is not "out to get" breeders who are responsible and take care of their animals the right way. It is out to get the heartless people who keep cages stacked in the backyard, with no covering,and animals in them with no room to turn around. It out to get the people who do that and don't clean the cages, it is out to get the ones who let fur get so matted and disgusting that you don't know what breed of dog it is. THAT is a true puppy mill. It is for dog fighters and sickos who torture animals because it is "fun"

WTFDude is right if you are taking care of your animals the right way, then you don't have to be worried about this law at all.

americasgone - You say animals have no souls but yet you seem so concerned over the number of animals killed at the shelter - so which one is it? Either you care about them or you don't.

Also what would you suggest to do with these animals if they don't humanely euthanize them? Let them run all over town and be hungry, killed by cars, fight, become public nuisance - Look I don't like killing animals either but what will we do with them? Also, I would imagine our shelter staff doesn't enjoy that part of their job one bit. How would you feel having to do that, could you deal with the emotional stress that job would put on you?

Our shelter is already adopting out, running foster programs, sending animals to the vet school for treatment and adopting, sending them on the Rescue Waggin program to be adopted up north, they are trying so hard to get them homes.

They recently lowered the cat adoption fees in an effort to try and adopt more out. People complain about the fees but if you look locally/regionally their fees are on par or less than some shelter/rescue groups. Every animal that is adopted out of our shelter is spayed/neutered before they go home with their new family. The fees help pay the vets who do the surgery and also help fund the care of the animals - a vet won't work for free, they need to be paid too. If you adopt out animals who are not "fixed" and people don't get it done you end up with more animals breeding and even more strays running around/animals in the shelter - it's a domino effect and our shelter is trying to help lessen it by making it mandatory before the animal goes home.

I know I am on a soapbox but the shelter is something I am passionate about. I have been volunteering with them on and off since high school age and I am nearing 30 now. I have seen it go through directors, good times and bad. I think right now is the best I have seen it run and the staff and board of directors are doing a good job with what they have available. I just wish more citizens would get positive and help than sit around and criticize. If we would all chip in time/money/support whatever we can, our shelter really could be so much more than it is now.
report abuse
« WTFDude wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 08:36 PM »
americaagone -- You really are a "genius", aren't you?

If you're treating your animals as they should be treated, then the government won't be "intruding" in your life and the law will have ZERO affect on you.

So, if you're a responsible pet owner, the existence of this law will have ZERO impact on your life.

As for the running of the shelter and the demeanor of those running it, I can't speak to that as I haven't adopted from that shelter.

I did adopt from the Aberdeen shelter and I foudn the lady there to be really great.

But, if, as you say, the people are rude, then they shouldn't be there, period.

These types of laws are for people who are not responsible pet owners.

Decent human beings who treat their animals humanely will have nothing to worry about with such a law.

So, really the only people who should have a problem with these sorts of laws are those that will have them imposed upon them. And the rest should be dealt with as harshly as possible within the law.

This law doesn't go far enough, but it's better than what we have now.

report abuse
« americasgone wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 08:12 PM »
Oh my the children have spoken. I have five dogs myself. But the last thing we need is more gov't intrusion into our lives. The last thing we need is more laws telling people what to do. And the last thing we need is someone from the shelter, the worst i have EVER seen, leading eh cause to adopt new animal laws. When the shelter stops killing animals wholesale then they can talk to me about animal cruelty.
report abuse
« tupelolady wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 05:06 PM »
I would like to see anyone who criticizes our shelter to go try and run it for 2 weeks, then come back and tell me your feelings.

I volunteer there regularly - I know from first hand experience you won't truly know what our shelter and its staff are dealing with until you go see it and experience it for yourself.

Personally I'd like to see all these negative nancy's get up off their butts and HELP DO SOMETHING to change what they have problems with instead of leaving it to the small handful of core volunteers who bust their butts helping.

Yes, it is unfortunate that our shelter is a kill shelter. What else could it be when we are taking on animals from the city and county, along with assisting in puppymill rescues etc. We NEED a bigger shelter with more capacity to help more animals. That won't happen until the donations and money needed can be met.
report abuse
« WTFDude wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 01:47 PM »
BTW, Mississippi is one of the first states to limit access to cold medicine to sick kids, and one of the last to pass a meaningful animal cruelty law.

What does that tell you?

It tells me that Mississippi just isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. :)
report abuse
« WTFDude wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 01:38 PM »
americasgone -- Yes, I am fully evolved -- a state that you've obviously yet to attain.

Here's a thought that you probably haven't ever had -- try reading a book sometime!

It's really amazing what you find out when you actually open one of those strange objects and read the words and put those words together to form sentences which actually comprise thoughts and sometimes even scientific information from scientists who have actually studied the topics that they're writing about!

Give it a try!! Don't be afraid! It's not evil! You might actually learn something about the world and the other beings in it!

report abuse
« tupelojoe81 wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 01:35 PM »
it sounds like you got bit by a dog americasgone....i wonder why???? ha.
report abuse
« americasgone wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 01:05 PM »
"Those of us who are fully evolved actually recognize that animals have souls, feel pain, have emotions like love, happiness, sadness, etc."

Animals have souls? What a joke. Animals have love? Crazy! You misinterpret instinctive behavior for love. Do you really think that is love when a dog looks you in the eyes? A dogs brain is just large enough to operate his body and exhibit instinctive behavior. Your dog or cat does not love you. But he sure as heck knows that you pet him, feed him and provide him with shelter so of course he enjoys you company. That ain't love Mr. Evolved. That is natural selection at it's very core.

You say MS is backward. I say I am glad as hell to be backward lest we end up like CA or MA.

Animals are just that. So if you want to save them go to a beef or chicken slaughterhouse and cry over all of that blood. What you say? It is okay if you like to eat animals but not okay if you think it loves you? Pfftt. Any cow can give you that same "love" look you think your dog can.
report abuse
« WTFDude wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 12:48 PM »
I haven't read this particular law, but ever since I moved back and discovered the weakness of Mississippi's animal cruelty laws, I've been concerned.

My question is, why don't our legislators model laws like this after successful laws in other states? I think that their egos won't let them entertain the idea that someone else has written a better law and they might benefit from looking at what successful legislators have done.

One thing that does concern me about what I know about this law is that it only applies to dogs and cats. What about horses and other livestock? They should be covered as well.

As for the seizure of animals prior to a hearing, that happens all the time in other states. It's necessary to remove the animal from the inhumane situation immediately and then a judge decides whether the seizure is permanent or whether the animal will be returned to the "owner."

As for those that believe that animals don't deserve protection by our laws, I just don't have words to describe just how unintelligent a position that is for anyone to take. Unfortunately, people here having that attitude towards animals is not surprising. Mississippi is pretty backwards and well behind the rest of the civilized world in almost every category. And that attitude towards animals is that taken by backwards, unsophisticated people.

Those of us who are fully evolved actually recognize that animals have souls, feel pain, have emotions like love, happiness, sadness, etc. If you haven't seen it in your own experiences with animals you're just not very observant or intelligent.

Someone mentioned that people who mistreat animals often wind up mistreating people. That's a scientifically proven psychological fact. And it goes even further than just mistreating people, it goes WAY beyond that. Almost every modern day serial killer that has been studied had a history of animal mistreatment in their backgrounds.

Here in the "Bible Belt" one would expect all these so-called "Christians" would actually be in favor of the strongest animal cruelty law possible. But, those who claim to be "Christians" and oppose such laws are demonstrating their hypocrisy as usual.

Lastly, I'm sorry to see that this story didn't stay on the front page of the site for very long, if at all. This site doesn't do a very good job of keeping the most relevant news in prominent locations so that it can be seen. This is much more important than a story on snow that didn't fall in our area!
report abuse
« americasgone wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 11:24 AM »
This type of law should be at the bottom of everybody's list. Aren't there more important things to worry about? I am really tired of seeing Hood's name in the paper. She runs the shelter like a dump killing hundreds of animals weekly. She is rude as heck and really seems to lack common sense.

Hey Hood wanna know why your shelter is overcrowded? Take a look at what you charge for adoptions. Then take a look at the way you treat people when they come in there. Not a good experience for potential adopters.
report abuse
« walou wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 11:12 AM »
I hope the law passes , and that's not enough.Should put them in a concrete room in the woods for about a month.
report abuse
« Bichon wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 10:50 AM »
Ain't this great, takes two staff writers to pen this article, one of which should have been charged with a crime for calling 911 to report an O'possum in the road.

It is just great for touchy feeley people to want to throw you in jail for animal abuse and defend killers of unborn babies.

Don't you just lov-it when staff writers post comments to defend each other's positions.

I love animals as much as anyone, but they are not human and should not be treated as such.

The supercilious animal rights people are in the business to make money and call any dog breeder a "puppy mill".

By the way, it is against the law for anyone to go on private property to see if a puppy has missed a meal.

Our state government cannot balance our budget, yet they cal waste tax payer money to debate passing frivilious laws.

report abuse
« ultracreep wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 10:12 AM »
I hope it passes as well. You don't just accidentally torture an animal. People who maim,burn,starve,torture, or disfigure other living things aren't normal. That's not something you do in the course of an average day.People that do things like that have severe mental problems, and most of them aren't far off from being able to do that to humans. I say nail em to the wall.
report abuse
« midtownwrecker wrote on Friday, Feb 12 at 09:35 AM »
I hope this bill passes.

WE ARE THE VOICES FOR THOSE WHO ARE VOICELESS
report abuse